A Vindication of the Rights of Woman summary

Today we hear about feminism and women’s rights on a daily basis, but in 1792 this was not the case.

A Vindication of the Rights of Woman is often considered one of the first feminist texts and has been an inspiration for feminist thinkers through the ages. Although it is over 200 years old, many of the issues Wollstonecraft raises are still debated today. These include the difference in education between boys and girls, why some traits are seen as male and some female, and how women should be part of the democratic process.

These blinks take a look at some of Mary Wollstonecraft’s main ideas from this seminal work. They are crucial for anyone who wants to understand the development of feminist ideas and intellectual history.

In these blinks, you’ll find out

• how a focus on women being beautiful deprives them of the respect men receive;
• why the way girls are encouraged to play emphasizes an existing physical disadvantage; and
• how inequality between men and women led to bad marriages.

Is there any material reason why girls shouldn’t be able to do all the same things as boys? Absolutely not. Yet from an early age, boys and girls are taught that they’re not equal, a lesson that’s perpetuated throughout their lives.

To combat this miseducation, girls should go to school alongside boys and study all the same subjects as them. Not just that, but these schools should also be public so that they’re full of kids from different backgrounds.

There’s a parallel to be drawn between women and the wealthy. In the fancy and expensive schools that the wealthy attend, students are often taught that they’re above reason and knowledge and that such skills are irrelevant to their lives. While women are denied an education, they’re indoctrinated with much the same idea.

However, such a thought is counterproductive to building a cohesive society and private schools limit children, boys included, by teaching them that they don’t need to develop the same skills as children of lesser means.

A similar process occurs on the playground as girls are discouraged from developing their physical strength. While boys are told to go out and play in the fields, developing a healthy physique from a young age, girls are made to stay indoors and play with dolls.

Such a division is an absolute travesty as it simply serves to redouble the physical advantage that boys already hold over girls. So, while the physical inferiority of girls to boys is a fact, the difference wouldn’t be as pronounced if girls were encouraged to engage in physical play.

By exaggerating the disparity in strength between women and men, society is simply making girls more dependent on boys. Beyond that, dressing up their dolls to be pretty only confirms for young girls that looks are the only important life pursuit.

So, education and physical activity are promoted primarily to boys, but what problems does this cause?

For one, it allows men to suppress the status of women in order to sustain their own power. For the most part, these men either want to keep women as sexual objects or are simply bullies with the sole goal of absolute control.

That’s why these men think women should only focus on being attractive to men. They’re also careful to distinguish between attractiveness and physical strength, as the latter would be deemed manly.

After all, women are taught to measure their value based on their ability to secure a desirable husband, and getting a good husband means being pretty and docile. This focus on marriage and aesthetic upkeep that is forced upon women in place of knowledge causes them to become vicious and cruel under their controlled and calm exteriors. It also puts women in a perpetual state of competition with one another and prevents them from forming caring bonds or learning through discussion.

For example, imagine a man’s single sister moves in  with her brother and his wife only to be kicked out by the wife, who feels threatened by another female presence – even if she poses absolutely no threat to her marriage.

Because of such fears, women are often sneaky and deceitful to their male companions as they believe such tactics are key to maintaining these relationships. In turn, men use this behavior to justify their harsh treatment of their wives.

If women were simply taught to view themselves as equal with men, both in body and in mind, it would not only benefit their own well-being but also that of their husbands – and their marital relationships as well.

A man’s relationship with his wife is molded by the inequality of the sexes, and men often treat their wives solely as a necessary means to procreation or a fashionable accessory.

Instead, men and women should forge friendships and not just love affairs. Such a practice would establish stronger and more sustainable bonds.

After all, friendship is far more important than simple romantic love. But accomplishing such a feat is easier said than done.

If women only appear morally virtuous and don’t have a proper understanding of morals and virtue, men will be inclined to treat them poorly and dismissively, especially if they happen to reject the virtues women have had projected onto them.

On the other hand, if women could truly acquire virtue and morals in the way that men do, they would earn the respect of the other sex. Friendship between men and women will only be possible when the sexes can interact as intellectual equals.

Not just that, but if men and women were equals, men would solicit prostitutes less often, and have fewer affairs. Such indiscretions are caused by the fact that men and women share little in common other than a will to sustain the human race. As a result, men tend to grow bored of their wives following the honeymoon phase.

So, instead of building a life with their wives, men seek thrills and treat their wives like strangers. At the same time, women mistrust their husbands, manipulating them whenever possible in an attempt to ensure faithfulness. However, if men and women were treated as equals, the double standard that currently allows men to sleep around – while women are forced to maintain sexual purity – would shrink.

Beyond that, if women were raised to be virtuous rather than taught to be superficially focused on their looks, they’d enjoy more ways of engaging their husbands. Such a change would liberate women from prostitution as a means of subsistence as they’d be able to support themselves with their intellect.

So, women should have greater rights than they do, but not so that they can overpower men. Rather, increasing the rights of women is necessary to put them on a fair footing with men and enable them to equally contribute to the world around them.

If women were men’s equals, they would be better able to bring up children and raise future generations. To this end, equal access to education would have a particularly strong impact. Well-educated women would be able to help their children with their studies. No longer would their sons have to rely on tutors to help them with their school work, and their daughters would be able to learn in their spare time, rather than being sent off to play with dolls.

Not just that, but women would also be kinder to their servants in front of their children. They would no longer feel the need to cruelly and desperately exert their power over someone else. As it is, children, especially girls, see their mothers’ poor behavior and make it their own, perpetuating a culture of malice rather than respect.

And last, but certainly not least, when treated equally, women would be able to take up matters of great importance to the world, rather than simply worrying about what to wear. They could become doctors who cure previously lethal diseases. They would also be better prepared to raise healthy children and prevent the deaths of infants.

Imagine if more women knew that breastfeeding is healthy for both the child and the mother. Since women can’t get pregnant while breastfeeding, the widespread adoption of this practice would end the issue of having too many babies in rapid succession, which would reduce the need for servants and ensure each child individual attention.